DENİZ TEKİN
Journalist Evren Demirdaş is under investigation again for allegedly "spreading misleading information" following a news report on a multi-million lira tender process in Elazığ province. The investigation, based on Turkey's controversial "disinformation law," stems from a complaint filed by the Elazığ Governor’s Office.
Background of the case
Demirdaş, known for reporting on public procurement processes, recently published an article titled "Governor justified it with 'security,' awarded million-lira tender through negotiation." The piece highlighted a road project tender conducted through a negotiated procedure by the Elazığ Special Provincial Administration, which operates under the governor’s office. The administration justified the tender’s non-competitive nature citing "security concerns."
This marks the second investigation into Demirdaş under Article 217/A of the Turkish Penal Code (TPC), which penalizes the dissemination of "publicly misleading information." Previously, on Nov. 2, authorities launched a probe over his Oct. 13 report on a 642 million TL tender awarded to a businessman affiliated with the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP).
Accusations and defense
The governor’s office alleges that Demirdaş's article wrongly attributed the tender directly to the governor, misleading the public and fostering hostility. They claim the report gave the impression of procedural misconduct, damaging the administration's reputation.
In response, Demirdaş defended his reporting during a police statement, emphasizing its factual basis and public interest. He stated:
“I have been a journalist in Elazığ for nearly 10 years, following major public tenders both locally and nationally. The tender in question was conducted under defense and security provisions, limiting participants. Although the administration claims the process was managed by the Special Provincial Administration, it operates under the governor’s authority. Thus, I referenced the governor’s office in my article. All details are verified through the Electronic Public Procurement Platform (EKAP). I had no intent to mislead or target anyone.”
Demirdaş concluded by requesting the case be dismissed, asserting his commitment to journalistic integrity and informing the public.
Broader implications
The investigation highlights ongoing concerns about press freedom in Turkey, where journalists frequently face legal challenges under the "disinformation law," criticized for stifling dissent. Media watchdogs argue that such cases aim to deter critical reporting, particularly on government actions and public spending.
